The figures reported below refer to 2008 comparisons, so they omit most of the horrific fall-out from the current economic crisis. as such, these comparisons relate more to the structural imbalances our state is running, not to the recessionary effects. This is worth keeping in mind, for it means that the differences between Ireland and other states reported below, as well as the adjustments required for us to reach sustainable long term equilibrium on spending and taxation sides will have to be put in place no matter what happens to our economy in years to come. It is also worth keeping in mind because the figures reported below underestimate the extent of our post-2008 imbalances compared to other countries that had experienced much less pronounced crisis over 2009.
All data is taken from the publicly available sources - the IMF and CSO - so the Government and our tax-and-spend crowd of Unions-led economists are fully aware of these. Plausible deniability does not apply, therefore, when it comes to our Government pronouncements about its policies and the current position of the Irish economy on international competitiveness scale.
Chart above plots Ireland's position vis-a-vis its peers in the developed world in terms of the overall size of the primary (non-capital) share of public expenditure in the economy. Two facts worth highlighting here:
- Ireland's Government spending as a share of our real economic income (GNP) is the second highest of all countries in the group, and is well in excess of the average for small open market economies (SOME). It is in excess of Germany (Berlin) and well ahead of the US (Boston).
- By this metric, Ireland simply does not qualify as a 'market' economy, as domestic private sector accounts here for less than 47% of GNP! In the USSR of the 1980's, private economy (black market) accounted for around 40% of the total GNP. Get the comparison?
Chart above maps Ireland relative to the US (Boston) and Germany (Berlin) to show just how absurd the whole notion of Ireland Inc being positioned between Boston and Berlin is in the real world. In reality, just one parameter - Social Benefits as a share of GDP/GNP - marks our relative position as being between Boston and Berlin. In every other parameter, we are a basket case of excessive public spending and taxation relative to both the US and Germany.
With the above data in mind, what adjustments in the budgetary positions will be required to bring Ireland into the exact position of being between US and Germany to reflect our stated competitive benefit of being an economy that can facilitate trade and investment flows between the two giants - the EU and US?
To restore our competitive balance we need:
- A cut of €23 billion in gross annual primary spending by the state (current expenditure) - some 14.7% of our GNP. Not €3bn as Brian Lenihan is doing, or €3.5bn as An Bord Snip Nua was suggesting. A whooping €23 billion, folks!
- The cut above cannot come from the capital budget side - where most of the cuts so far took place. It has to be cut from the current expenditure. The reason for this is simple - capital spending is one-off item of expenditure and it is associated, in theory, with a net positive return on investment. Current spending is permanent and yields no financial return.
- The cuts must include at the very least a €9.3bn reduction in the wages and pensions bill in the public sector (5.9% of GNP or almost 44% cut in the total PS wages bill, achievable through both reductions in numbers employed and wages paid and pensions benefits entitlements).
- Social benefits, at least in the long run, actually are in line with us being smack between Boston and Berlin, so no adjustment is needed here in the short term (given further deterioration in the fiscal position in Ireland since 2008, I would actually recommend a temporary cut here. Also, longer term reforms, to change the structure of welfare benefits and state pensions must be enacted, but for the reasons different from the budgetary considerations).
- Instead of raising tax revenue, Irish Government should engage in a dramatic reduction of tax burden on the economy. Generally, total tax take in the Irish economy exceeds the average Boston-Berlin position by 6.5% of GNP, requiring a reduction in overall tax burden of €10.3bn on 2008 numbers.
- This reduction in the tax burden should include a cut in personal income tax, CGT and personal gains/profits taxes of 2.1% of GNP or €3.3bn.
- both the EU and the US,
- as well as relative to our main competitors world wide - the small open market economies.
I find these figures very misleading.
CSO gives 2008 GNP as 154.5 billion.
Dept of Finance gives total govt expenditure in 2008 as 55.7 billion euro. (44.7 current + ll capital).
This means government accounted for a little over a third of the economy in 2008 -- well below levels of continental Europe.
Or what am I missing here?
Our real problem seems to have been a failure to devise a rational taxation system not dependent on bubble revenues from property sales.
People on average incomes pay minimal income tax and no local taxes (apart from bin charges); we also have no taxes on property owned. Contrast that with any other developed country including the US.
As for cutting govt. expenditure by 23 billion, get real! You'd have to sack every single public sector worker in the country.
It wasn't just tax receipts that were inflated by the credit bubble, GNP was too. Take the massive private sector borrowing out of the picture and government spending as a proportion of the economy would have been much, much higher.
DofF fiscal data reported in the Exchequer statements is net of associated receipts (see here: Supplementary Budget 2009: Macroeconomic and Fiscal Framework document http://www.budget.gov.ie/Budgets/2009Supp/2009Supp.aspx - see page 17 of the document).
IMF Fiscal Monitor, May 14, 2010, Table 4, page 85. Ireland General Government Expenditure 2008 = 41.2% of GDP. CSO data (here http://trueeconomics.blogspot.com/2010/03/economics-26032010-national-output.html) 17.37% GDP/GNP gap. I have applied the gap of 23% consistent with 2009 gap. Using 2008 gap, you have 49.62% GGE/GNP ratio.
The same numbers hold per IMF table 3a from "From Stimulus to Consolidation: Revenue and Expenditure Policies in Advanced and Emerging Economies" Prepared by Fiscal Affairs Department, Approved by Carlo Cottarelli April 30, 2010.
The only caveat supplied by the IMF is that Irish figures (as well as all European countries figures) are supplied by the Eurostat, with "capital spending proxied by gross fixed capital formation".
Comparisons for other countries are given in the table here: http://trueeconomics.blogspot.com/2010/05/economics-16052010-imf-on-fiscal.html using actual GDP/GNP gaps. Averages are given below.
IMF defines general government sector as consisting "of all government units and all nonmarket nonprofit institutions that are controlled and mainly financed by government units, comprising the central, state, and local governments. The general government sector does not include public corporations or quasi- corporations".
IMF figures are exactly confirmed in the Stability Programme Updates from Budget 2009 (table 7, line 7: linked here http://www.budget.gov.ie/Budgets/2009/2009.aspx) and you can see actual figures for gross expenditure for 2008 provided in the Supplementary Budget 2009: Macroeconomic and Fiscal Framework document (http://www.budget.gov.ie/Budgets/2009Supp/2009Supp.aspx - see page 17 of the document). This lists provisional outrun for 2008, Gross Current Expenditure of €53.475 billion, plus Gross Capital Expenditure of €9.048 billion, for a total Gross Government Expenditure of €62.523 billion.
Now, per your conjecture about our tax system:
1) I agree - it is imbalanced too much in the direction of windfall transactions taxes. However, stamp duties are taxes on property, so it is incorrect to claim that we had no property tax. it simply was a wrong tax.
2) Our tax burden is not that much different from other countries, and in fact by many metrics, our state already collects too much in taxes in some areas.
Detailed analysis and comparatives for our tax system relative to the peer states are supplied here: http://trueeconomics.blogspot.com/2010/05/economics-19052010-euro-rescue-and-tax.html
Lastly, I actually would not compare Ireland to the entire Eurozone, or EU. I would compare Ireland to our real peers - small open market economies that we compete against (and yes, I do recognize that competitiveness is more than just tax and expenditure story).
Hope this explains...
Thanks for commenting and reading.
Mack, thanks - spot on. Note that our GDP was also inflated by it - as some of the revenues accruing to MNCs is raised from the Government spending and the private sector boom.
after reading this article and seeing those charts and figures, and now the country is in a knot over a further €3 billion in cuts, I think it's time to leave the country.
Excellent report, can I also include the danger of the looming national debt.
From the An Bord Snip report, they state that the cateogry that consists mainly of provision for debt-servicing, that the figures show that Central Fund current expenditure will rise to €11.2bn by 2013 from its 2008 baseline of €3.9bn.
Does this mean that our interest repayments in 2013 could be 11 billion? Do you know what the central fund expenditure consists of?
Post a Comment