- 84% vote for the Programme for Government - which contains some good ideas (Site Value Tax / Land Value Tax) and some pretty bad ones...
- 31% against Nama.
- The Greens have sold the country to stay in power for another 6 months - the sentiment of several Party members who spoke to me. Reasoning: "we've been in the Government only a year and we need more time to make our policies reality". A fine argument assuming that once they lose power, their policies cannot be reversed/undone.
- The country got another taste of the sanctimonious and perverse Green ways (also a quote from a Party member), where members voted for Nama as their price tag for PfG. In other words, they sold the entire nation's future by hoisting Nama on this economy in order to gain few token concessions from the FF - a truly Machiavellian pact.
One of my sources alleged that these Northern Irish Greens were 'helped' to get to RDS by the party officials / leadership in order to secure today's vote. I was told that buses were used by the party to deliver them to Dublin. (I have no confirmation of this, so this is a rumor.)
So we might have a strange situation developing here:
- the taxpayers of this country have no say on Nama,
- while taxpayers of the other country do...
truly horrific. The GP deserve political oblivion. Clearly they have the understanding of economics of a rabid mink.
shameful, the Irish Green Party damage green politics internationally.
The Program for National Bankruptcy revealed by FF and the Greens on friday is 40 pages long and the word 'cut' does not feature even once. Our 2010 budget deficit will be 20% of GNP and the Greens think the solution is encouraging cycle tourism!! God help us..
The finest NAMA-DDDA-Anglo-Irish site in the country is 500 metres from Mr Gormley's house: €550 million Irish Glass Bottle site.
Seven hundred hospital beds have already been shut.
John The Traitor now has two years accrued towards his Ministerial Pension ...
At least the mink are safe, right? And who else is willing to stick their necks out for stags? Some good came out of this. I think they also got a number of firm commitments to determine if matters should be send to review committees. So it's not all bad. Chin up, guys.
Post a Comment