2/1/2014: Manufacturing PMI for Ireland: December 2013

Manufacturing PMI is out for Ireland today, per Markit/Investec release: "The Irish manufacturing sector ended 2013 on a positive note as growth of output and new orders gained momentum in December. Meanwhile, the current sequence of job creation was extended to seven months. On the price front, input cost inflation picked up slightly while firms raised their output prices for the fourth month running."

Please note: since Markit/Investec no longer release actual numbers for subindices (e.g. employment or orders or export orders, etc), we have to take these claims on faith. For example, the release claims increased export orders from China as one of the drivers of the new business improvement. Yet Irish exports to China are low and it is hard to see how this source of uplift can register as a driver in the overall data, unless the survey participation is severely skewed toward some specific MNCs with remaining significant exposure to exports to China.

Note: Good exports to China from Ireland in January-October 2013 stood at a miserly EUR1.642 billion, down from EUR1.885 billion recorded in the same period of 2012 and representing just 2.26% of our total goods exports in January-October 2013.

Further per release: "The seasonally adjusted Investec Purchasing Managers‟ Index® (PMI®) – an indicator designed to provide a single-figure measure of the health of the manufacturing industry – rose to 53.5 in December from 52.4 in November. This signalled a solid improvement in business conditions, and the seventh in as many months."

The last claim is a matter of interpretation. 1.1 points gain in the PMI reading is the 4th largest in 12 months of 2013 and 7th largest in the last 24 months. However, the index reading in December is the 2nd highest in 2013 and the 3rd highest over the last 2 years, which is, undoubtedly, a good thing.

Two charts and dynamic trends to illustrate headline index changes:

In terms of overall PMI, Manufacturing activity averaged at 51.1 over the last 12 months, so the current reading is above that. However, December reading is below the 3mo average for November-December 2013 which stands at 53.6.

Q1 2013 average PMI for Manufacturing was 50.13, and this fell to 49.33 in Q2 2013, before rising to 51.9 in Q3 2013 and to a healthy 53.6 in Q4 2013.

Overall, we are now into third consecutive month with the PMI for Manufacturing index statistically above 50.0. Another good thing.


Full Markit/Investec release is here: http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/119915a961bd40caa4218d77234245e2

31/12/2013: Debt and Growth: Consumption Crowding-Out Channel

Since the overhyped and outright hysterical 'controversy' over the Reinhart & Rogoff debt thesis blew up across the media earlier this year (I covered much of the controversy on the blog and in my columns, for example, here http://trueeconomics.blogspot.ie/2013/07/272013-village-june-2013-real-effects.html), it became - to put it mildly - unfashionable to reference the adverse effects of debt on growth and economy. Too bad, some economists seem to have missed that point.

A new study from the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy, titled "Nonlinear Effects of Government Debt on Private Consumption in OECD Countries" (see citation below) looked at "nonlinear effects of government debt on private consumption in 16 OECD countries. The estimated consumption function shows smooth regime switching depending on the debt-to-GDP ratio, and the threshold level of regime switching is found to be the ratio of 83.7 percent. The results reveal that a higher level of government debt crowds out private consumption to a greater extent, and that the degree of the crowding out effect has deteriorated since the global financial crisis."

Wait, there are thresholds here… 83.7% debt/GDP ratio - very close to the  S. Cecchetti, M. Mohanty and F. Zampolli thresholds (see http://trueeconomics.blogspot.ie/2011/09/26092011-irelands-debt-overhang.html). And there is the 'causal link' between debt and growth via crowding out of private consumption.

31/12/2013: Negative equity and entrepreneurship: new evidence

Since the beginning of the crisis, I have written about and presented on the topic of negative equity and its adverse effects on economy and society.

Some of the earlier links on this topic can be found here:
http://trueeconomics.blogspot.ie/2010/06/15062010-negative-equity-1.html
http://trueeconomics.blogspot.ie/2010/06/economics-15062010-negative-equity-2.html
http://trueeconomics.blogspot.ie/2010/06/economics-15062010-negative-equity-3.html

One significant adverse effect of negative equity relates to the impact it has (via investment constraints) on entrepreneurship: http://trueeconomics.blogspot.ie/2010/01/economics-15012010-negative-equity.html

This month, NBER published yet another study on the above topic, covering the issue of property values impact on collateral availability for entrepreneurial activities.

The study, "Housing Collateral and Entrepreneurship" (NBER Working Paper No. w19680) by Martin Schmalz, David Alexandre Spaer and David Thesmar "shows that collateral constraints restrict entrepreneurial activity. Our empirical strategy uses variations in local house prices as shocks to the value of collateral available to individuals owning a house and controls for local demand shocks by comparing entrepreneurial activity of homeowners and renters operating in the same region. We find that an increase in collateral value leads to a higher probability of becoming an entrepreneur."

What is novel to the study results and is also extremely important from economic policy point of view is that "Conditional on entry, entrepreneurs with access to more valuable collateral create larger firms and more value added, and are more likely to survive, even in the long run."

Now, keep in mind - Ireland's politicians and both the previous and current Government officials have been consistently claiming that negative equity only matters when households need to move from their current location to a new residence. In contrast, I have asserted from the start of the crisis that the adverse effects of negative equity are present not only in the context of households moving locations, but also for the households that are staying in their current location and that some of the effects are completely independent from the ability of the households to fund their current mortgages.

Link to the study: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2360948

29/12/2013: Icelandic Model for Debt Crises Resolution?

A very comprehensive paper analysing the Icelandic approach to personal debt and corporate insolvency crises resolution:
http://hhi.hi.is/sites/hhi.hi.is/files/W-series/2013/WP1310.pdf

Latest comparatives between Icelandic and Irish economic performance: http://trueeconomics.blogspot.ie/2013/10/27102013-ireland-v-iceland-full-deck.html

20/12/2013: Q3 GDP: Is There a Domestic Recovery?

In previous posts, I covered:
1) top-level data on GDP and GNP growth in q3 2013 (here: http://trueeconomics.blogspot.ie/2013/12/19122013-good-gdp-gnp-growth-headlines.html)
2) expenditure components of GDP and GNP (here: http://trueeconomics.blogspot.ie/2013/12/19122013-qna-q3-2013-expenditure-side.html), and
3) 3-quarters aggregates changes in GDP and GNP (here: http://trueeconomics.blogspot.ie/2013/12/20122013-how-real-is-that-gdp-and-gnp.html)


Now, onto the Domestic Demand.

With both GDP and GNP now severely skewed by the transfer pricing going on in the ICT Services sectors in Ireland, it is no longer reasonable to look at either GDP or GNP for the signs of underlying activity gains in the real Irish economy. Instead, we should consider a combination of all three: changes in GDP, GNP and Final Domestic Demand. Final Domestic Demand is defined as a combination of:

• Government spending on goods and services (other than investment goods)
• Government and private investment in the economy, and
• Private household consumption of goods and services

Unlike Total Domestic Demand, Final Domestic Demand excludes stocks built up by businesses.


First, looking at the Q1-Q3 aggregates comparatives based on data that is not seasonally-adjusted and is expressed in constant euros. In Q1-Q3 2013, final domestic demand in Ireland fell 1.41% compared to the same period in 2012 (down EUR1,293 million y/y). Final Domestic Demand is now down 2.89% on the first three quarters of 2011 and is down 21.6% on the same period of 2007.

In other words, over Q-Q3 2013, on aggregate, there is still no recovery in the domestic economy in Ireland.

Second, let's take a look at q/q changes in the GDP, GNP and Final Domestic Demand. For this purpose, we consider seasonally-adjusted constant euros series.

In Q3 2013, Exports of goods and services fell 0.80% q/q on seasonally-adjusted basis. The decline was shallow compared to 4.63% rise in Q2 2013, but it replicates the pattern of 'quarter up, quarter down' established since Q3 2012.

Overall, since Q1 2011 (in other words since the 'adjustment programme' or 'bailout' started) Irish exports of goods and services were up over 6 quarters and down over 5 quarters. Exports-led recovery stacks ups s follows:

• In 1997-2007 average quarterly growth in exports of goods and services in Ireland stood at 2.445%;
• In 2008-present that rate was 0.281% and
• In 2011-present it is 0.4988%

In other words, massive increases in ICT services exports over the period of the crisis are not strong enough to generate significant uplift momentum in exports growth.

GDP at constant market prices rose 1.502% q/q in Q3 2013, marking a second consecutive quarter of growth. In Q2 2013 the rise was 1.023%. Since Q1 2011, GDP rose on a quarterly basis in 7 quarters and was down in 4 quarters. Overall recovery comparatives are:

• In 1997-2007 GDP growth average 1.630% on a quarterly basis;
• Over 2008-present the average is -0.353% and
• Over Q1 2011-present the average is +0.358%

So there is a longer-term recovery on average, based on GDP, but it is weak, consistent with annualised rate of growth of just 1.44%.

GNP at constant market prices rose 1.580% q/q in Q3 2013, marking the first quarter of growth. In Q2 2013 the GNP contracted 0.133%. Since Q1 2011, GNP rose on a quarterly basis in 6 quarters, it was flat at zero in one quarter, and was down in 4 quarters. Overall recovery comparatives are:

• In 1997-2007 GNP growth averaged 1.522% on a quarterly basis;
• Over 2008-present the average is -0.302% and
• Over Q1 2011-present the average is +0.171%

So there is a longer-term recovery on average, based on GNP, but it is weak, consistent with annualised rate of growth of just 0.68%.

Final Domestic Demand at constant market prices rose 2.412% q/q in Q3 2013, marking the second quarter of growth. In Q2 2013 the FDD was up 0.218%. Since Q1 2011, Final Domestic Demand rose on a quarterly basis in 7 quarters, and was down in 4 quarters. Overall recovery comparatives are:

• In 1997-2007 FDD growth averaged 1.621% on a quarterly basis;
• Over 2008-present the average is -0.961% and
• Over Q1 2011-present the average is -0.175%

So there is no longer-term recovery on average, based on Final Domestic Demand, with FDD contracting on average at an annualised rate of 0.70%. There is, however, good news of FDD rising for two consecutive quarters, clocking cumulative growth of just 2.64% over 6 months or 5.34% annualised. The problem is that the levels from which this growth is taking place are low.

As shown above, overall recovery is not yet taking hold in the domestic economy, although there are some gains recorded in the domestic demand that are encouraging and have been sustained over 2 consecutive quarters.

20/12/2013: How Real Is that GDP and GNP Growth in Ireland? Q3 data

In previous two posts, I covered top-level data on GDP and GNP growth in q3 2013 (here: http://trueeconomics.blogspot.ie/2013/12/19122013-good-gdp-gnp-growth-headlines.html) and expenditure components of GDP and GNP (here: http://trueeconomics.blogspot.ie/2013/12/19122013-qna-q3-2013-expenditure-side.html).

Now, let's take a look at 3-quarters aggregates. The reason why looking at 3 quarters aggregates makes sense is that q/q changes are volatile, while y/y changes are only reflective of quarter-wide movements in activity. 9-months January-September 2013 data comparatives to a year ago provide a better visibility as to what has been happening in the economy so far during this year.

All analysis below is based on seasonally unadjusted data in constant prices terms.

In 3 quarters (Q1-Q3) of 2013, Personal Consumption of Goods and Services fell 1.22% when compared to the same period in 2012. The series are down 1.93% on Q1-Q3 2011. In level terms, personal consumption is down EUR734 million for the first 9 months of 2013 compared to a year ago.

Expenditure by Central and Local Government on Current Goods and Services was down 0.96% for the 9 months January-September 2013 compared to the same period of 2012 and is down 5.03% on same period in 2011. In level terms, Government spending on goods and services is down EUR178 million in Q1-Q3 2013 compared to a year ago.

Gross Domestic Fixed Capital Formation for the nine months January-September 2013 has fallen 2.90% compared to the same period a year ago (in level terms, -EUR381 million). Compared to the same period in 2011, gross fixed capital formation is now down 4.42%. When we talk about 'big increases' in investment, keep in mind, Q1-Q3 cumulated Gross Fixed Capital Formation was down 55% on the same period for 2007.

Exports of Goods and Services for the nine months January-September 2013 were down 0.8% on the same period a year ago (-EUR1,013 million), but up 0.84% on the same period of 2011. This hardly shows 'robust growth' in exports. Exports composition has shifted once again in favour of Services. Goods exports shrunk over the last nine months by 4.51% compared to same period 2012 (-EUR2,809 million) and are now down 8.29% on Q1-Q3 cumulative for 2011 and down 2.47% on Q1-Q3 2007 too. Meanwhile, exports of services rose 2.77% in Q1-Q3 2013 compared to a year ago (+EUR1,796 million) as per 'Google-tax effect' and these are now up 10.69% on Q1-Q3 2011 and up 21.29% on Q1-Q3 2007. At the rate we are going, pretty soon Barrow Street GDP will exceed that of South Korea, which will make Poly's Pizza more economically important than Geneva.

Sarcasm aside, Imports of goods and services (another driver - via their collapse - of positive GDP and GNP news) are down 0.93% y/y in Q1-Q3 2013 (-EUR908 million) and are down 1.35% on same period 2011. Compared to Q1-Q3 2007 imports of goods and services are down massive 9.49% - the effect that contributes significantly to upside of GDP. Goods imports alone are now down 33.3% on Q1-Q3 2007 and these were down 4% (-EUR1,419 million) on Q1-Q3 cumulative for 2012.

So, let's add few things. In 9 months January-September 2013, relative to the same period of 2012:
1) Personal consumption fell EUR734 million
2) Government consumption fell EUR178 million
3) Domestic Gross Fixed Capital formation fell EUR381 million
4) Exports of Goods and Services fell EUR1,013 million
5) Imports of Goods and Services fell EUR908 million, and
6) Stocks of goods rose EUR503 million.

(1)-(4) subtracted from GDP growth, (5) and (6) added to GDP growth. Which means that the only two positive contributions to growth in our GDP came from: imports decline and stocks of goods held by businesses rise. This is hardly a good news, as both sources of growth are really not about increased/improved activity in the economy.

Thus, GDP at constant market prices fell over the period of Q1-Q3 2013 compared to Q1-Q3 2012 by 0.58% (or EUR706 million). Notice the word 'fell' - whilst there were rises in GDP in Q3 and Q2 in q/q basis, overall so far, 2013 total output in the economy is below that registered for the same period in 2012.

GDP is also down 0.04% on same period 2011 and is down 6.82% on the same period in 2007.

Let me know if you are spotting any positive growth in the above.

Next, the difference between GDP and GNP is formed by the Net Factor Income from the Rest of the World. This also fell in Q1-Q3 2013 compared to the same period of 2012 - down 14.37% y/y (or -EUR3,378 million), which 'contributed' a positive swing to the GNP in the amount of almost EUR3.38 billion. The reason for this? Well, growth-generating fall-off in activity in the phrama sector meant that MNCs were booking lower profits via Ireland and this, allegedly, has a positive effect on our economy… err… on our GNP.

GNP, propelled by stocks accounting tricks, hocus-pocus of transfer pricing and continued decline in imports rose 2.69% in Q1-Q3 2013 compared to Q1-Q3 2012 (up EUR2,670 million = decline in GDP of -EUR706million plus decline in factor payments of +EUR3,378 million). Seriously, folks, this is beginning to look like a joke!

Based on the same physics of transfer pricing miracles, Irish GNP is now 4.16% ahead of Q1-Q3 reading for 2011.

Recap: On expenditure side of the National Accounts, growth in 2013 is not exactly real (for GNP) and not present (for GDP).

Analysis of Total Domestic Demand (aka domestic economy) is to follow. Before then, charts to illustrate the above:

7/12/2013: Global Manufacturing PMIs: Summary for October-November

In previous posts I covered PMIs for Ireland for both services and manufacturing: http://trueeconomics.blogspot.ie/2013/12/5122013-services-and-manufacturing-pmis.html Also, detailed PMIs coverage is linked in the above.

Here is a neat summary of global Manufacturing PMIs via Markit:

5/12/2013: Services and Manufacturing PMIs for Ireland: November 2013

Yesterday, Markit and Investec released the second set of Purchasing Managers' Indices (PMIs) for Ireland covering Services sector. As usual, here is the analysis of combined Manufacturing and Services PMIs.

Detailed analysis of Manufacturing PMIs was covered here: http://trueeconomics.blogspot.ie/2013/12/2122013-manufacturing-pmi-for-ireland.html. Also, note, I covered actual services activity index (latest data through October) here: http://trueeconomics.blogspot.ie/2013/12/5122013-irish-services-index-october.html

Manufacturing PMIs in November 2013:
- Slipped to 52.4 (still in expansionary territory) from 54.9 in September.
- 3mo Average through August 2013 was 52.1 against 3mo average through November 2013 at 53.3.
- 6mo average through November 2013 is up 4.6% on previous.

Services PMIs in November 2013:
- Slipped to 57.1 from 60.1 in October.
- 3mo average for the period through August 2013 was at 55.4 and 3mo average through November is at 58.0
- 6mo average is up 6.6% on previous.

Both, Manufacturing and Services PMIs are now above 50 for 6 consecutive months. In statical terms, the two PMIs are above 50.0 for 6 months for Services and 3 months for Manufacturing.

Overall, the picture is consistent with upward sub-trend over 3 months for both series.

However, changes in 3mo averages warrant caution on sustainability:

Joint evolution of the series y/y is still encouraging:

And 24-months rolling correlation between series is rising once again - currently at 0.340, the highest since December 2011 when both series were in sub-50 territory.

So net is that the PMIs are still strong, trend is still upward and the short-run uplift continues. Big question is whether this is going to translate into real activity on the ground or mark another period of booming PMIs and stagnant economy. Time will tell...

2/12/2013: Manufacturing PMI for Ireland: November 2013

Manufacturing PMI for November released by market and Investec today shows slight slowdown in the rate of manufacturing sector expansion in Ireland.

Overall PMI declined from blistering 54.9 in October to more moderate and sustainable 52.4 in November. October reading was remarkable as it was the highest PMI reading posted since 56.0 was recorded in April 2011. Thus, some moderation was expected.

November reading pushed 12mo MA to 51.1, implying that on average Irish manufacturing was expanding over the last 12 months. 6mo MA is at 52.2 and 3mo MA is 53.3 through November, up on 51.1 3mo average through August 2013. Current 3mo average is ahead of that for 2010, 2011 and 2012. even setting October reading at 3mo MA level through September still leaves the average ahead of 2010-2012.

Current reading remains in statistically significant territory - another added positive.

Aside from that, no comment is possible, since Investec and Markit are continuing not to release underlying sub-indices.

With the above we can now confirm a new upward sub-trend from May 2013. Let's hope it will continue.

27/11/2013: Irish Employment by Sectors: Q3 2013

In the previous post I looked at the data from QNHS on broader measures of unemployment in the economy (http://trueeconomics.blogspot.ie/2013/11/26112013-broader-unemployment.html). This time, let's take a look at employment numbers across various sectors. The data below is not seasonally adjusted, so these are actual counts.

Starting from the top:

• Overall employment levels at the end of Q3 2013 stood at 1,899,300 which represents a rise of 3.15% y/y. Over the last 12 months, employment averaged 1,865,930 which is 1.54% ahead of employment levels 12 months average through Q3 2012.
• Relative to pre-crisis levels (average of 2008), employment is still down 10.76%, but compared to the crisis period trough we are up 4.07%.
• Current levels of employment are the highest since Q2 2010.
• Agricultural employment changes are well highlighted by the CSO and as such I will not interpret these here.
• Non-agricultural private sector employment is at 1,308,200 in Q3 2013, up 2.98% y/y. 12 months average level through Q3 2013 is at 1,278,950 up 0.99% on 12 months average through Q3 2012. Not exactly spectacular change, but still a welcome positive reading. Relative to pre-crisis 2008 average, non-agricultural private sector employment was 14.96% lower in Q3 2013.
• Public sector and state-controlled sectors (health and education) employment fell 0.99% y/y to 480,500. 12mo average through Q3 2013 was at 486,930 which is 0.16% down on previous 12mo average through Q3 2012. Not exactly a massive drop-off. However, compared to 2008 average, employment in this category is 1.2% higher in Q3 2013 - a poor omen for the claims of significant reductions in public and state-controlled employment. 

Chart to illustrate:

Welcoming changes in the higher value-added sectors of the economy:

• ICT sector employment stood at 82,000 in Q3 2013, up 4.86% y/y. 12mo average through Q3 2013 is at 80,750 and this is up 2.34% on 12mo average through Q3 2012. Levels of employment in the sector in Q3 2013 were 14.77% ahead of 2008 average.
• Professional, scientific and technical activities employment rose to 113,300 in Q3 2013 up 10.86% y/y and the 12mo average through Q3 2013 stood at 106,350 which is 7.1% higher than in 12 months through Q3 2012. Nonetheless, the sector employment levels in Q3 2013 were 2.22% below the 2008 average.
• Administrative and support services employment stood at 64,700 in Q3 2013, down 2.85% y/y and 12mo average through Q3 2013 was at 61,350 which is 4.66% below the average through Q3 2012. The sector employment is still well below 2008 levels - down 15.73%.
• Financial, insurance and real estate services employment fell 0.78% y/y to 101,500 in Q3 2013 and 12mo average through Q3 2013 was at 100,730 down 0.93% on 12mo average through Q3 2012. Compared to pre-crisis levels (2008 average) employment in this sector is down 5.10% in Q3 2013.

Education, Health and Public Administration all showed continued weaknesses:

• Public administration and defence, compulsory social security sector employment declined 3.61% y/y to 96,100, and 12 mo average through Q3 2013 stood at 95,600 or 4.66% lower than over 12 months through Q3 2102.Relative to 2008 average, employment in the sector is now down 8.63%.
• Education sector employment rose 0.14% y/y to 140,800. Sector employment averaged 145,980 in 12 months through Q3 2013 which is 1.02% ahead of 12 months average through Q3 2012. However, compared to 2008 average, Q3 2013 level was 3.13% lower.
• Human Health and Social Work sector employment was down 0.57% y/y in Q3 2013. 12mo average through Q3 2013 stood at 245,350 which is 0.99% higher than 12mo average through Q3 2012. Compared to 2008 average, Q3 2013 reading was 8.62% higher.

Employment in Industry is quietly running slightly up despite overall decline in goods exports values:

• Industry ex-Construction sector employment rose 4.72% y/y in Q3 2013 to 242,000 and was up in 12mo average terms by 1.3%. However, compared to pre-crisis average for 2008, Q3 2013 reading was still 15.98% lower.
• Industry including construction sector employment rose 4.58% y/y to 347,300. In 12mo through Q3 2013, employment in the sector was up 0.59% compared to 12 months average through Q3 2012. Relative to pre-crisis average for 2008, employment in sector stood massive 34.15% lower in Q3 2013.
• Meanwhile, services employment rose 1.30% y/y in Q3 2013 to1,439,200. In 12mo through Q3 2013 employment averaged 1,423,050 which is 0.7% higher than for the same period in 2012. Compared to 2008 average levels, Q3 2013 employment in Services stood at -2.64%.

So on the net - some good aggregate numbers. Rates of increases, especially averaging-out over 12 months (4 quarters) period are still not exactly spectacular, but we do have overall growth in employment and this growth is also present in the higher value-added sectors. 

Here is the summary of changes for the period since the current Government took office:

11/11/2013: Services and Manufacturing PMIs for Ireland: October 2013

With some delay, let's update the data on Irish PMIs.

Before we do, quick explanation for a delay - I used to be on the mailing list for Investec releases to PMIs for years (way before the organisation became a part of Investec). This all ended some months back when I was struck off the mailing list. Presumably, being a columnist with 2 publications & blogger, who always and regularly cites PMIs and Investec as their publisher, is just not enough to earn one the privilege of being sent the release. Oh, well…

Now to numbers… 

Services PMI hit 60.1 in October, up on 56.8 in September, marking the second highest reading since January 2007 (the highest was recorded in August this year at 61.6). This is a strong return. 3mo average for the period August - October 2012 was 53.9, current run is 59.5, so the distance y/y is 10.4% - statistically significant. 

Notably, from January 2010 through current, the average deviation of PMI from 50.0 is 2.5, so we are solidly above the average.

Quarterly averages are also strong. Q1 2013 posted 54.23 and Q2 2013 was at 54.27, but Q3 2013 came in at 58.67. And we are now running well ahead of that.

With full-sample standard deviation of the PMI reading distance to 50.0 at 7.3  (same for the period from January 2008 through current being 6.84), we are now solidly in statistically significant territory for expansion since July 2013.

Manufacturing PMI also strengthened, although by much less than Services. Manufacturing PMI hit 54.9 in October, up on 52.7 in September and 3mo average through October 2013 is at 53.2, which is 3.% ahead of the 3mo MA through October 2012.

Quarterly averages are signalling weaker growth, however. Q1 2013 was at 50.1 (basically, zero growth in statistical terms), while Q2 2013 stood at 49.3 (same - zero growth in statistical terms). Q3 2013 came in at 51.3 and the October reading is ahead of this. In fact, October 2013 reading is the highest since April 2011. October reading is statistically significant, based on historical data, but it is not statistically significantly different from 50 on the basis of data from January 2008.

The above shows one thing: we are above historical and 2008-present averages for both Manufacturing and Services PMIs (good news). Below chart confirms relatively strong performance for the series on 3mo MA basis (good news):

As chart below shows, there is a third good news bit: both series have now broken away from their asymptotic trend, with Manufacturing at last showing some life.

Note to caveat the above. As I showed before, both manufacturing and services PMIs have relatively weak relation to actual GDP and GNP growth, with Manufacturing PMI being, predictably, better anchored to real growth here. Details here: http://trueeconomics.blogspot.ie/2013/10/3102013-irish-pmis-are-they-meaningful.html

1/11/2013: Irish Consumer Confidence: Handle with Caution...

Having written just yesterday about Retail Sales for September 2013 (see here: http://trueeconomics.blogspot.ie/2013/10/31102013-i-am-sorry-but-retail-sales.html) I can now update the Consumer Confidence reading to October.

In October, Consumer Confidence indicator rose to 76.2 from 73.1 in September. This is the 10th highest reading for the index since April 2005 and the highest in 76 months since June 2007. If it were indicative of anything, we are sitting on a cusp of a consumer demand boom.

However, problem is that Consumer Confidence has a negative historical correlation with Retail Sales over the period of current crisis: correlation between Consumer Confidence and Value of Retail Sales since June 2008 is -0.663 and with Volume of Retail Sales it is -0.599. In other words, according to data, higher consumer confidence has been associated with lower retail sales (consumer demand).

Here's an illustration, updated to October for Consumer Confidence figure...

So caution, please, with interpreting Consumer Confidence.

31/10/2013: I am sorry, but Retail Sales did not get any better in September, again...

With some lag, time to update Irish Retail Sales stats to September data. Instead of going over the usual details of the dynamics, let's take a broader look at what is happening in the sector:

Starting with a chart:

As above clearly shows, both the Value and the Volume of core retail sales are going nowhere - the series are bouncing along the bottom, switching direction almost on month basis. This suggests that

1. Consumers are not going to the shops anymore than they absolutely need to; and
2. Consumers are running out of money to spend on things they need to purchase, while retailers are running out of margins to cut prices.

Of course, you would also notice in the above chart the absolutely bonkers behaviour of Consumer Confidence indicator. And you are right: as chart below clearly highlights, the Consumer Confidence has completely detached itself from Retail Sector realities:

Timing the start of the crisis to late the start of 2009 (if we take the start at mid-2008 things are even uglier for the Consumer Confidence), we have:

• Consumer confidence rising along an upward trend;
• Retail Sales in Volume and Value falling along declining trend;
• Consumer confidence being more volatile than Volume and Value indicators for Retail Sales

This implies that Consumers are claiming that which they do not practice. Why? I have no idea. Patriotic duty to be optimistic? By Consumer Confidence recent readings, we should observe retail sales activity around late 2006-2007 levels. Ooops... Value of Retail Sales is now below where they were back at the start of the series in 2005. Volume of Retail Sales is now around late 2005.

The same applies to more smooth 3mo MA series:

There are no statistically or economically meaningful links between 3mo MA for Consumer Confidence and either Value or Volume of Retail Sales. Worse, year on year, the disconnect between the series has grown wider for both, with the widening being steeper for Value index. Again, this potentially indicates that margins in the retail sales have been wiped out and that this is not enough to get consumers spending again.

Which raises one serious question: local authorities are planning to jack up their rates in 2014. How will retail businesses afford these when they are trading in the above conditions?

As you know, I run my own index of Retail Sector Activity - RSAI - and updating this to September shows the flatlining of the trend for Retail Sector activity overall. All in, we are now in 75 months-long period of declining or flat retail sales:

You can turn the numbers upside down and compute them sideways. You can listen to the Government spokespersons telling us about improving consumer confidence until the Halloween pyres consume the last tractor tyre. You can believe that we are in a turnaround.

And I wish I could do so alongside you... but the above figures are not showing this. Perhaps we can add 'not yet' to that statement to keep some hope alive.

27/10/2013: Ireland v Iceland: Full Deck

Here's the deck for comparatives between Iceland and Ireland. You can click on every slide to enlarge. Enjoy!