Recently released data on 2011-2016 Irish Government financial metrics shows that despite all the reports concerning the adverse impact of austerity on Irish Government employees, there is hardly any evidence of such an effect at the pay level data.
Specifically, in 2011, total compensation bill for the Irish Government employees stood at EUR 19.389 billion. This 5.39% between 2011 and the lowest point in the cycle (2014 at EUR18.344 billion), before rising once again by 2016 to EUR 19.354 billion. Total savings achieved during 2012-2016 period compared to 2011 levels of expenditure amounted to EUR2.759 billion on the aggregate, or 2.85% (annualized rate of savings averaged less than 0.57% per annum.
Statistically, there simply is no evidence of any material savings delivered by the 'austerity' measures relating to Government compensation bills.
But, statistically, there is a clear evidence of Irish public sector employment poor performance. Oxford University's 2017 International Civil Service Effectiveness Index, http://www.bsg.ox.ac.uk/international-civil-service-effectiveness-index, ranked Ireland's Civil Service effectiveness below average when compared across 31 countries covered in the report.
Spider chart below shows clearly two 'outlier' areas of competencies and KPIs in which Irish Civil Service excels: Tax Administration and Human Resource Management. Rest of the metrics: mediocre, to poor, to outright awful.
- 16th out of 31 countries in terms of Civil Service Integrity and Policy Making
- 26th in terms of Openness (bottom 10)
- 20th in terms of Capabilities, and Fiscal and Financial Management
- 13th in terms of Inclusiveness
- 22nd in terms of Attributes (bottom 10)
- 28th in terms of Regulation (bottom 5)
- 8th in terms of Crisis Risk Management
- 1st in terms of Human Resource Management (aka, working conditions and practices)
- 4th in terms of Tax Administration
- 31st in terms of Social Security Administration (dead last)
- 21st in Digital Services and in terms of Functions (bottom 10)
So while managing to score at the top of the league of countries surveyed in terms of pay, perks, hiring and promotion, Irish Civil Service ranked within bottom 10 countries in terms of areas of key performance indicators, relevant to actual service delivery, with exception of one: Tax Collection. May be we shall call it Pay, perks & Tax Collection Service?
But, hey, know the meme: it's all because of severe austerity-driven underfunding... right?..
Update:
In response to my post, the Press Office at Dept. of Public Expenditure and Reform posted the following, quite insightful comments on the LinkedIn, that I am reproducing verbatim here:
Secretary General Robert Watt: I was interested in reading this comment – and in particular the data on civil service performance. There are methodological issues with the Study quoted. Nevertheless readers might be interested in other data about the effectiveness of the Irish civil and public service which might give a more balanced assessment of performance. Important to consider the evidence before we reach conclusions. Also, important to note difference between Civil Service (36,000 staff) and wider public service (320,000 staff)
Public Service performance
Over a range of international rankings, the IPA’s annual public service trends publication shows the Irish public service performing above average on many indicators.
The IPA’s Public Sector Trends, 2016
- Ireland is ranked 1st in the EU as the most professional and least politicised public administration in the Europe;
- Ireland is ranked 5th for quality of public administration in the EU;
- Ireland is ranked 6th in the EU for maintenance of traditional public service values (integrity);
- Ireland is ranked 4th in the EU for perception of the effectiveness of government decisions;
- Ireland is ranked 2nd in the EU for encouraging competition and a supportive regulatory environment;
- Ireland is ranked 4th in the EU for regulatory quality;
- Ireland is ranked 3rd in the EU in comparison of how bureaucracy can hinder business;
- Business update of eGovernment services is higher than most of Europe with Ireland ranked 1st for highest update of electronic procurement in Europe;
- According to the World Bank, Ireland is ranked well above average for Government Effectiveness (although individual rankings are not available);
- Ireland is ranked 5th in Europe in the competitive advantage provided by the education system;
- Ireland ranks 10th for life expectancy at birth and 8th for consumer health outcomes, but slightly below average for the cost-effectiveness of health spending;
The OECD’s Government at a Glance, published in July 2017 shows Ireland ranking strongly across a range of metrics although healthcare is a notable exception:
- Ireland is ranked 2nd in terms of citizen satisfaction with the education system and schools;
- Ireland is ranked 6th for citizen satisfaction with the judicial system and the courts and is also in the top 4 best improved countries in the last decade;
- Ireland is ranked 26th for citizen satisfaction with the healthcare system (slightly below average).
Recent customer satisfaction surveys of the Irish civil service show it delivering its highest customer satisfaction ratings to date. Satisfaction with both the outcome and the service delivered was rated over 80% which is close to the credible maximum.
General Public Civil Service Satisfaction Survey, conducted Q1 2017:
- 83% are satisfied with the service they received (up from 77% in 2015);
- 82% are satisfied with the outcome of their customer service experience (up from 76% in 2015);
- 46% would speak highly of the civil service (up from 39% in 2015);
- 87% of customers claim that service levels received either met or exceeded expectations (up from 83% in 2015).
Business Customers Civil Service Satisfaction Survey, conducted, Q4 2016:
- 82% are satisfied with the service they received (up from 71% in 2009);
- 82% are satisfied with the outcome of the service received (up from 70% in 2009);
- 61% felt that the service provided has improved in the last 5 years.
Lots done but more to do!
My reply to the Department comment:
Thanks for the comments on this, Press Office at Dept. of Public Expenditure and Reform. I got similar methodological comments regarding the robustness of the Oxford study via Facebook as well and, as I noted, in the technical analysis part of the paper, Oxford centre does show improved metrics for Irish civil service performance in the later data, which is heartening. Also, noted the apparent dispersion of scores and ranks across countries, with what we might expect as potentially stronger performers being ranked extremely low. Also, noted the issue of data on Social Welfare for Ireland being skewed out of OECD range and impacted by 2011 legacy issues (although it is unclear to me how spending via health budget on social welfare is treated in the OECD and Oxford data). I will post your comments on the blog to make sure these are not lost to the readers.
I agree: lots done and certainly more to do, still.
