Last night at the Dublin Chamber dinner, Taoiseach Enda Kenny made a rather common, but egregious in its nature statement that Ireland has the highest savings rate in the OECD at 12% GDP. Speaking before him, the President of the Dublin Chamber, Patrick Coveney, made a similar statement, but referenced 14% savings rate. Both speakers were identifying a high savings rate as being an impediment to consumer spending and recovery.
In addition to the above, the Chambers President made another startling juxtaposition. In his speech he said that:
- Savings are too high and we need to 'do something' to reduce these;
- Investment is too low
- In the future, investment (via bank lending) will remain low.
Let me deal first with the last set of claims. In the Irish economy, savings are used to pay down debts (thus supporting deleveraging of the households and companies, and preventing collapse of our banks) and invest in economic activity. Reducing the debt-repayment component of savings would require a default/restructuring of private debts. The remainder of our savings goes to finance investment (direct equity & direct lending to businesses) and deposits in the banks (which in turn normally finance lending). So which part of our savings would Patrick Coveney like to cut? The banks bit (precipitating collapse of the banks) or the investment bit (precipitating further decline in investment)?
I am not even going to ask Mr Coveney as to what he might suggest that the Government should do to cut our savings rate. Impose huge wealth taxes, or go straight to a large-scale expropriations of 'excessive' savings? Both will do wonders to Ireland's reputation abroad, let alone to the dynamics of future investment at home.
Instead, lets move on to the myths both speakers were keen on repeating - the myths of our allegedly massively high savings rates. All of the data below is taken from the IMF WEO database.
Let us rank Ireland's gross savings rate compared to all other advanced economies (higher rank means lower savings rate):
Contrary to what our Taoiseach and Mr Coveney were saying, Ireland's savings rate in 2010-2014 is estimated by the IMF to be... the 5th lowest in the sample of 33 advanced economies around the world. May be it is the highest in the Euro zone? Oh, no - it is actually the fourth lowest in the Euro zone.
So what about this year then? Oh, that would be exactly the same as for the 2010-2014 average:
But wait, you might say, surely we are saving as an economy more today than in the past? Oops...
As above shows, during the 1980-2011 period, average savings rate in Ireland stood at 18.63% of GDP. In 2012 it will be 10.82% of GDP. In 2011 it was 10.59%, in 2010 11.53% and so on. Not even close to the historical average! And not close to our peers all of whom have much higher rates of savings: Israel at 18.94%, Finland at 19.84%, Belgium at 21.38%, Austria at 25.23%, Netherlands and Hong Kong at 26.29%, Luxembourg at 26.57%, and so on.
And yes, Mr Coveney, savings and investment are linked in Ireland:
And the gap between savings and investment in Ireland - explained in part by the banks claims on our savings via loans repayments:
... well that gap is currently at the advanced economies average and it was below that average during the crisis so far.
In other words, there is no 'excess' savings in Ireland. As this economy continues to struggle with the banks debts (ah, the Chambers dinner was sponsored by one of the Pillar Banks) our savings-investment gap is forecast to rise above the advanced economies average in 2013-2017. That is the illustration of the Taoiseach's famous dictum that he won't have 'defaulter' written on his forehead. So clean forehead for our Taoiseach means no investment for businesses. Simples...
1 comment:
Bravo, Dr G !
Who is An Taoiseach's economic adviser ?
He (I know that it is not a female) should resign or be dismissed.
If he approves of the thinking behind the remarks, he should also be stripped of his degrees.
If he doesn't, he should express his disagreement, and since he has had enough time to educate the Taoiseach, resignation is appropriate, as either the job is impossible or he (the adviser) is totally failing in it.
I am sure other reasons for such a course will suggest themselves, but I will not be drawn on those at this time.
Post a Comment