Wednesday, July 15, 2009

Economics 15/07/2009: Bonds Spreads: ECB Model

As promised earlier (here), I have re-done the ECB model estimated for Belgium, Ireland, Greece, Spain, France, Italy, the Netherlands, Austria, Portugal and Finland for the specific parameterisation for Ireland. Taking the path for our debt, deficit and bond issuances through 2013 under three different assumptions:
Assumption 1: NAMA bonds are off the public balance sheet and have no adverse impact on pricing, plus our liquidity conditions are in line with those of Germany (this corresponds to the dream scenario);
Assumption 2: NAMA bonds are on the public balance sheet, implying some adverse pricing effects, but out liquidity remains in line with German (this corresponds to 'markets are asleep' scenario); and
Assumption 3: NAMA bonds impact our balance sheet and yield shut down of the international borrowing markets for NAMA bonds (this is ECB buys NAMA scenario).

Chart below shows the resulting spreads over German 10y Bund:
One quick explanation is also due: 2009 levels are the fundamentals-implied levels of spreads under the ECB model. This is what the spread should be, were the markets pricing our bonds in line with what ECB says they are doing. ECB Monthly Bulletin does not report residuals, so I can't tell the accuracy of the pricing model.

Nonetheless, three things stand out:
  1. We are facing potential upward pressure on yield in 2009, should we go to the markets instead of the ECB;
  2. NAMA is posing serious risk of destroying our balance sheet in years to come as the cost of debt financing can soar not only for NAMA-own bonds, but also for all the bonds rolled over by the Government.
  3. It is relatively clear that any auction since January 2009 below 6.2% yield would have flopped, were it not for the ECB lending window circus.
And notice the term structure emerging in the chart below... Someone is not quite ready to buy Brian Lenihan (or for that matter ESRI's) story that we are getting serious about controlling our spending into the medium term future...

Sunday, July 12, 2009

Economics 12/07/2009: Travel figures

As an added bonus to Irish Times eager attack on my article in Sunday Times couple of weeks ago here is last week's press release from Ryanair:

"Ryanair, the World’s favourite airline, today (10th July 09) called on the Irish Government to stop ripping-off travellers after CSO figures confirmed that all Government controlled/regulated bus (up 11%), rail (up 9%) and taxi fares (up 8%) increased in the past year while unregulated airfares fell (14%) thanks to Ryanair. The Irish Government is now targeting air passengers with a self defeating revenue negative €10 tourist tax. The Irish Government’s €10 tourist tax is an effective 100% price increase on many of Ryanair’s winter fares to/from Dublin, Cork and Shannon. Ryanair called on the Irish Government to stop taxing tourists and follow the example of the Belgian, Dutch, Greek and Spanish governments who have all scrapped tourist taxes and/or reduced airport charges to zero to stimulate tourism. "Traffic at the DAA Monopoly run Dublin Airport fell 14% in June to 1.9 million as the Irish Government rips off passengers with a silly €10 tourist tax."

Disclosure (for Irish Times sake): I do not own any shares in Aer Lingus, Ryanair. I have zero allocation to Irish equities at this time, but I feel honoured to be attacked alongside Michael O'Leary...

Saturday, July 11, 2009

Economics 11/07/2009: Public Servants earn more than their employers

Time to get outraged, folks. Per latest CSO annual National Employment Survey, public sector pay is completely beyond any reasonable comparatives with the private sector. Here is a table (courtesy of Davy - yes, credit is due to Davy for an excellent note on this):"Median earnings were 52% higher in the public jobs", said Davy. "or the equivalent occupation, education level or experience, the smallest gap is 25% and the largest is 76%. The gap between public and private pay cannot be justified by saying that public sector employees are more
experienced, better educated or do different jobs. For example, how can we explain the fact that security personnel in the public sector get paid 46% more than their private sector peers?"

The Unions love babbling about the bulls***t poor low-paid entry jobs in the public sector. Table above shows that younger age cohorts and lower experience cohorts are earning vastly greater wages in the public sector than in the private sector.

Workers with 20-29 years of experience achieve a wage that is 36% higher in the public service
than in the private service. What does this mean? It means that the actual gap for those with greater tenure is even wider than that because workers in the private sector in this category of experience have to save 25-30% of their disposable income in pensions, while their counterparts in the public sector are enjoying lavish retirement plans benefits.

Davy note: "In February, the first attempt was made to rectify the imbalance. But the public pension levy only matched the wage cuts in the private sector, so the gap has probably
not closed. The public pay bill of €20bn in 2009 amounts to more than one-third of voted public expenditure. Further pay cuts of at least 10% are justified by these data." Oh, dear - can't we actually have some ambition? These figures show that public pay bill should be cut by ca40-45% through an equal measure of reduced wages (-25-30%) and reduced numbers employed (-20%). This will still produce a public sector employment premium, but it will at the very least force them to work more productively.

Davy concluded the note with the following statement: "Hourly earnings are 48% on average higher in the public sector. But average annual earnings are 32% higher because public employees work fewer hours. But it is not the case that bonuses are much higher in the private sector. In 2002, bonuses (and benefit-in-kind) in the private sector amounted to €1565 (or 5% of average annual earnings) versus only €149 in the public service. Five years on in 2007, bonuses in the public service had almost caught up at €1,807 versus €2,211."

Another interesting fact is the distribution of various grades in private and public sector. Notice the relative proportions of managerial and admin staff vs professional staff. This is not a sign of the public sector depth of expertise (high ratio of professionals), but of inflation in terminology. When an elementary school teacher or a basic nurse are considered professional grade employees, academics should be called demi-gods...
What all of us are forgetting is that as taxpayers - we employ them, not the other way around. It is time to start issuing pink slips. And by the way - if you hear once again anyone talking about 'not creating a conflict between the two sectors' - guess what: by granting themselves these gratuitous increases in wages, they - the public sector - have taken hard earned money from all of us, rich and poor. It was an involuntary transaction that enriched them alone. The state has presided over this system of wealth transfer under the guise of Social Partnership. We have every right to demand our money back. It is conflict time!

Friday, July 10, 2009

Friday Evening Economics

Oh no, I am not kidding - this one is for real. They've found a way to beat the property market blues down in Laois (hat tip to JH):Imagine having HIM as a neighbor!

Happy Friday all!

Economics 10/07/2009: Don't panic, ECB is... errr... backing down

On a light-hearted side of the blog:As they say in one famous commercial: for serious press, there's Mastercard, for BJs, there's Mayo Advertiser. (Hat tip: JH)



As the Bank of New York Mellon, one of the world’s largest and, in my view lowest counterparty risk custodian banks says the markets are now seriously disenchanted with European financials.

Per FT report today, concerns about the European banking sector are at their highest level since March. Euro might be sliding.BoNYM said its data showed net outflows from German bunds for the first time since mid-March. This is at the time when our own clowns are claiming that there is now a clarity in the borrowing markets for Irish debt. Hmmm... Clarity about what? An impeding disaster that is named NAMA?

BoNY Mellon also tracks outflows from Italian, Spanish, Portuguese, Belgian and Greek bonds. Emerging European markets lead, with APIIGS, plus France, Belgium, Germany and Sweden are at the forefront of the new pressure. By the end of this round - the acronym of 'troubled' or 'exposed' states will have 27 letters in it. Per FT report, Austria, Italy, France, Belgium, Germany and Sweden, which together accounted for 84% of the exposure to Eastern Europe. FT quotes BoNYM head of currency research saying that the euro area has lost its safe haven status, and is increasingly seen as a high-risk region among international investors. Thank god someone is being realistic...

But not in the marbled halls of the ECB. Those guys are simply out to lunch. Per their latest assessment (here): "Despite the financial turmoil, the global landscape of international currencies and - within that - the share of the euro remained steady. Specifically, between end-2007 and end-2008, the share of euro-denominated instruments increased by around 1 percentage point for outstanding debt securities, around 2 percentage points for outstanding cross-border loans and deposits, and around 1 percentage point for global foreign exchange reserve holdings... The review also shows that the international role of the euro maintains a strong regional pattern. Its international use continues to be most pronounced in countries with close geographical and institutional links with the euro area."

But the ECB's rosy take on the Euro is only half a problem. ECB's Monthly Bulletin (see here: scroll to 09/07/2009) is already on the path of plotting 'exit strategies' from the current active support policies - despite giving a rather gloomy outlook for the Euro zone for 2009-2010... Go figure. A companion paper to the bulletin has another re-print of the already trite table that was first floated by the OECD back in January 2009 and then slightly updated by the Article IV paper by the IMF last month. This is:
Enjoy - our Government's contingent liabilities relating to the banking crisis are ten times greater than those of the second most-screwed up banking sector in the euro area - Belgium. Oh, we are having some fun...

But not enough, I hear you say? Here is another good one from the ECB:
Now, California is considered to be bunkrupt, given its state deficit is only $24bn through next 12-18 months (depending on the budgetary framework taken), relative to a GDP of $1.8trillion a year - less than 0.008-0.013% of GDP. Ireland? Well - depends on whether you count NAMA or not, we are pushing for some 12-30% of GDP... Spot the difference? Ok, another chart then:We are facing worse deficit than Greece, but our spreads are lower... What gives? The market is not pricing in NAMA as a state liability. Not yet.

Here is what ECB used to assess the bond spreads:
"The following empirical model is used to explain the ten-year government bond yield spreads of
ten euro area countries (inc Ireland) over Germany (spread):
spreadit=α+ρ spreadit-1+β1 ANNit+β2FISCit+β3IntlRiskt+β4LIQit+εit

In this model, ANN denotes the announcements of bank rescue packages made by individual euro area governments (this variable takes the value 1 after the date of the announcement and the value 0 before); FISC denotes the expected general government budget balance and/or gross debt as a share of GDP, relative to Germany, over the next two years, as released biannually by the European Commission; IntlRisk is a proxy for international investor risk aversion, as measured by the difference between the ten-year AAA-rated corporate bond yield in the United States and the US ten-year Treasury bond yield; LIQ is a proxy for the degree of liquidity of euro area government bond markets, measured by the size of a government’s gross debt issuance relative to Germany; εit is the unexplained residual."

For the lack of time right now, I can't re-parameterize the model to derive the values of the fundamentals-justified spread for Ireland. I shall do this over the weekend, but here are the main results for the group of 10 countries:
Good luck.

Thursday, July 9, 2009

Economics 09/07/2009: Green Shoots to Brown Manure

Inflation figures are out - more significant deflation in works than was anticipated by the analysts (-0.3% in June relative to May, with annual rate off -5.4% in June against 4.7% in May). We are also diverging from the Eurozone, though no one should really care about that. Mortgage costs reductions (down 5.7% on average in June relative to May) were the largest factor. Public sectors and state-controlled prices are still in inflationary territory, so no surprise here either. My prediction for the annual inflation rate to hit -5.8-6% in Q4 2009 and reach -4.1-4.3% in a year as a whole. Public sector v private sector price differentials should widen by ca 5.5-6%, so the rip-off that is our State controlled economy will continue into 2010.

A decent note on inflation was from the Davy's this time around (sadly, my usual favorite Ulster Bank note was a bit less advanced than customary). Davy: "The good news is that Ireland has closed the gap further with the euro area price level. HICP in the euro area was up 0.2% mom, according to the “flash estimate”, versus no change (+0.0%) here in June. Ireland's price level is slowly but surely re-adjusting towards the euro area-16 level. Note that the gap was a massive 22% in 2008 on average according to Eurostat. It has closed by more than two percentage points since the peak last year and will be below 20% on average at end-2009. We do not think the price levels should necessarily converge (productivity and, hence, income disparities justify a premium), but Ireland's exporting sector – particularly the indigenous part – needs the gap to tighten significantly yet."

Now, not to overplay these trends, one has to be aware of the fact that this is exactly what we are missing in terms of devaluation. Competitiveness, normally restored via dropping one's currency value, would imply the value of the Irish Euro traveling south of the current 20% price gap with the EU and would require a devaluation to the tune of 30%. Why? I don't frankly believe in our superior productivity, so any income differential between Ireland, and say, Germany, should be nominal. We can't do that currency adjustment. Which means that with price deflation taking, say, 6-10% of the Eurozone-Ireland gap away, this leaves a 20-24% decline in wages to take up the slack. Awesome price to pay for the Euro membership.


Production in manufacturing figures for May 2009 are out as well:
Turnover index is down on renewed pressure - sales are stalling again, but production index is up, so is overcapacity looming again?
The two series crossed over in May, so expect production to turn down in summer months and turnover index to stagnate, setting stage for new layoffs should things fail to improve in September. Margins tighten, so workers must be next.

As manufacturing records -1.3% fall in January-May 2009 in annual terms, the rate of decline has indeed slowed, but this can easily be a technical correction before a renewed pressure down. Of course, 18.7% increase in pharma output obscured the reality somewhat. Significantly, other modern sectors posted a 22% drop in output, while domestic sectors recorded 13.8% contraction in 2009 to June 1. Now, recall that Davy eagles have spotted the end of economy-wide recession by pointing to agriculture turn-around. Inclusive of massive subsidies boost to pork producers, food sector output was down 0.4% in the first five months of 2009.

In seasonally adjusted index terms, manufacturing industries now stand at 97.6 - a reading that is bang-on in line with December 2008 (97.4) and February (97.5), marking the third lowest point for the sector since 2005. Turnover indices have hit new spells of deterioration in Manufacturing, Chemicals and Chemical Products, Basic Pharma Products & Preparations, Computer, electronic & Optical Products and Other Manufacturing - in other all sectors but Food Products. Capital goods production index is at the second lowest point since January 2008, Intermediate Goods index is no turning negative again.

In case you need an illustrative proof:
Slightly more interesting day for the US economy.

First, a great salvo from Warren Buffett, who said that as unemployment can hit 11%, the US economy might need a second round of stimulus. To those still looking for those 'green shoots', Buffett's analysis is clear: "We're not in a freefall, but we're not in a recovery either," he told ABC's "Good Morning America. We were in a freefall really in the last quarter of last year, starting in the financial markets and spreading to the economy, and we had this huge change in behaviour." Buffett compared the 2009 $787 billion stimulus passed by Congress to "half a tablet of Viagra and then having also a bunch of candy mixed in --- it doesn't have really quite the wallop."

Second, US first-time claims for state unemployment benefits fell 52,000 to 565,000 in the latest weekly data, after seasonal adjustment, while continuing claims hit a record high, as the Labor Department reported. The four-week average of initial claims was down 10,000 to 606,000. The monthly moving average of continuing claims rose 12,000 to a record 6.77mln.

Nouriel Roubini has a superb article in Forbes (here): "The June employment report suggests that the alleged green shoots are mostly yellow weeds that may eventually turn into brown manure." A priceless openning salvo. As Brian Cowen is waiting for the US to pull us out of the depression.